What is a Section 27 deposit release?
In Victoria, a Section 27 statement lets a seller ask for the deposit before settlement. A plain-English guide to what it is, why sellers want it, what buyers should check, and when to think twice before consenting.
Between signing a contract and settling on a Victorian property, the deposit usually sits in trust — typically with the selling agent. A Section 27 statement is the mechanism that lets the seller ask for that deposit early, before settlement happens. It is a routine document on most sales, but it is not automatic and it is not always something a buyer should sign without thinking.
This article explains, in client terms, what a Section 27 actually is, why sellers ask for one, what a buyer should check before consenting, and how it differs from the Section 32 Vendor Statement that buyers see at the start of the transaction.
What is a Section 27 statement?
A Section 27 statement is a written statement given by the seller to the buyer under section 27 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic). Its purpose is to allow the deposit paid under the contract of sale to be released to the seller before settlement, instead of being held in trust until the day the property changes hands.
The statement sets out information about the seller's finances against the property — chiefly any mortgage or other debt secured against the title — so that the buyer can make an informed decision about whether to consent to the deposit being released early. Without a properly completed Section 27 and the buyer's consent (express or deemed), the deposit stays in trust until settlement.
Why is it called a Section 27?
The name simply refers to section 27 of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic), which is the provision that authorises early release of the deposit and sets out the disclosure the seller must make to obtain it. The same convention gives us "Section 32" — that one refers to section 32 of the same Act, which deals with the vendor's pre-contract disclosure statement. The two documents do entirely different work; the shared naming convention is the only thing they have in common.
Why sellers ask for early deposit release
Sellers usually ask for early release because they need access to the money before settlement. The most common reasons are practical:
- to use the deposit as the deposit on the seller's next property purchase;
- to pay down a related debt or contribute to bridging finance;
- to fund the seller's moving, storage or short-term accommodation costs;
- to give the selling agent's commission and marketing costs a clean source of payment ahead of settlement, where the contract allows.
None of these reasons obligate the buyer to agree — they simply explain why the request is being made. A sale can complete perfectly well with the deposit held in trust until settlement; early release is a convenience for the seller, not a requirement of the contract.
What buyers need to check
The buyer's interest in a Section 27 is straightforward: if the deposit is released early and the sale later fails, the deposit needs to be recoverable. A buyer reviewing a Section 27 should check that the statement is complete, that the property's financial picture is consistent with the Section 32 they received before signing, and that nothing material has changed in the meantime.
Under the current rules, early release is only available where the contract is unconditional and the seller has given the buyer proof-of-debts information the buyer is satisfied with. Consumer Affairs Victoria states that the seller must provide evidence, to the buyer's satisfaction, that either there are no debts secured against the property, or the total debts secured against the property do not exceed 80% of the property sale price. The buyer cannot release the deposit until at least 28 days after the date the contract was signed.
In particular, the buyer's lawyer or conveyancer will check that any mortgage or charge over the property is identified, that the total debts secured against the property do not exceed 80% of the sale price, and that the seller is not under financial pressure that would put the sale at risk. Where the figures are tight — for example a heavily mortgaged property where the deposit is close to the seller's equity — the prudent advice is often to withhold consent and let the deposit stay in trust until settlement.
What information should be disclosed
The statement must disclose the particulars necessary for the buyer to assess whether their deposit is safe with the seller. In practice that means:
- the seller's full name and the property being sold;
- details of any mortgage, charge or other encumbrance affecting the property — the lender, the amount currently owing, and any arrears;
- details of any caveat lodged against the title;
- information showing whether there are no debts secured against the property, or whether the total secured debts do not exceed 80% of the sale price; and
- the seller's signed declaration that the information given is true.
If the figures or the encumbrances disclosed in the Section 27 do not reconcile with the title search or the information that was in the Section 32, the buyer's conveyancer will ask for an explanation before consent is given. A clean statement is the norm; an unexplained discrepancy is a reason to pause.
A Section 27 is a yes-or-no decision for the buyer. The right answer in most sales is yes — but only after the figures have been checked, not before.
Can a buyer object?
Yes. The buyer is not required to consent to early release. Section 27 entitles the buyer to either accept the statement and release the deposit, or to object — in writing — within 28 days of receiving the statement. A timely written objection keeps the deposit in trust until settlement.
Common reasons a buyer may object include:
- the statement is incomplete or unsigned;
- the disclosed figures show debts secured against the property exceeding 80% of the sale price;
- the property is the subject of a caveat or other proceeding that was not previously disclosed;
- the seller is in arrears on the existing loan;
- the buyer's lawyer or conveyancer has identified a title or contractual issue that has not yet been resolved.
An objection is not an accusation of bad faith — it is a procedural step that protects the buyer's deposit. It does not affect the buyer's obligation to settle; the contract still proceeds to settlement on the agreed terms.
What happens if the buyer does nothing?
If the buyer does not object in writing within the statutory period after receiving a Section 27 statement that contains the required information, the buyer may be taken to have authorised release of the deposit. This does not mean the deposit is released automatically — the statement must be properly completed and delivered, and the buyer retains the right to object on proper grounds. It is also one of the reasons every Section 27 should be reviewed by the buyer's conveyancer as soon as it is received: the clock starts running on delivery.
The stakeholder — usually the selling agent, or in some cases the seller's conveyancer or lawyer — will release the deposit once the 28-day period has expired with no valid objection, or sooner if the buyer expressly consents. The deposit cannot be released before at least 28 days after the date the contract was signed. The stakeholder's role is to hold the deposit, not to assess the statement; the protection for the buyer is the right of objection itself.
Looking ahead: Consumer Affairs Victoria has announced that this early-release process will be repealed and replaced from 1 July 2027, when seller and purchaser will instead be able to agree to early release by a condition in the contract. That change is not yet in force — the Section 27 process described in this article remains the current law for 2026 transactions.
How Section 27 differs from Section 32
It is easy to confuse the two because of the similar name. The substance is very different.
- Section 32 is a pre-contract disclosure: title, planning, rates, owners corporation and similar property-specific matters. The buyer reads it before signing.
- Section 27 is a deposit-release statement: the seller's financial position against the property, given after the contract is signed, so the buyer can decide whether to consent to early release of the deposit.
Section 27 is also not the settlement itself. The contract still has to complete on the agreed settlement date, with title transferring and the balance of the price paid. Section 27 only changes the timing of one part — when the deposit, already paid by the buyer, becomes available to the seller.
Why legal advice matters
Section 27 statements are usually straightforward, but the consequences of getting them wrong sit with the deposit itself — generally one of the largest single payments in the transaction. A buyer who signs without review can release the deposit to a seller who later fails to complete, and then has to recover the money rather than simply receive it back from the stakeholder.
On the seller's side, a Section 27 prepared without care can be defective — for example, omitting a registered caveat, understating the loan balance, or failing to obtain the signature in the right form. A defective statement entitles the buyer to refuse consent and can delay access to the deposit, which often defeats the entire reason the seller asked for early release in the first place.
In both directions, the practical answer is the same: have the statement prepared, given and reviewed by a property lawyer or licensed conveyancer who deals with Victorian contracts of sale day in, day out.
Key takeaways
- A Section 27 is a statement that lets the seller request early release of the deposit before settlement.
- It is given after the contract is signed and is separate from the Section 32 vendor statement.
- Early release requires an unconditional contract and evidence, to the buyer's satisfaction, that there are no secured debts or that total secured debts do not exceed 80% of the sale price.
- The deposit cannot be released until at least 28 days after the contract was signed; the buyer has 28 days from receipt of the statement to object in writing, and if no valid objection is made the buyer may be taken to have authorised release.
- The buyer's lawyer or conveyancer checks the disclosed mortgages, caveats and figures against the title and the Section 32 before any consent is given.
- Section 27 only changes the timing of the deposit — the contract still has to settle on the agreed date.
Frequently asked questions.
- Is a Section 27 the same as a Section 32?
- No. A Section 32 is the seller's pre-contract disclosure about the property — title, planning, rates and similar matters — given to the buyer before signing. A Section 27 is a separate statement given after signing, asking the buyer to consent to early release of the deposit. The shared naming is just a reference to the relevant sections of the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic).
- Do I have to sign a Section 27 as a buyer?
- No. A buyer is not required to actively sign or consent to a Section 27. The buyer has 28 days from receipt to object in writing. If the buyer does not object within that statutory period after receiving the required information, the buyer may be taken to have authorised release of the deposit.
- Why does the seller want the deposit released early?
- Sellers typically want early release to use the deposit funds before settlement — most often as a deposit on their next property, to contribute to bridging finance, or to cover moving costs and the agent's commission. These are convenience reasons; they do not place any obligation on the buyer to consent.
- Can the deposit be released before settlement?
- Yes — but only if the contract is unconditional, a valid Section 27 statement has been given to the buyer, the seller has provided evidence to the buyer's satisfaction that there are no secured debts or that total secured debts do not exceed 80% of the sale price, and the buyer has consented or is taken to have consented. The deposit cannot be released until at least 28 days after the contract was signed. Without all of that, the deposit stays in trust with the stakeholder (usually the selling agent) until settlement.
- What happens if I object to a Section 27?
- A valid written objection lodged within the 28-day period stops the deposit from being released early. The deposit remains in trust until settlement, when it forms part of the funds flow as normal. An objection does not affect the contract itself — the parties still proceed to settlement on the agreed terms.
- Is early deposit release safe?
- It is usually safe where the Section 27 is complete, the disclosed mortgage and any other encumbrances are well within the sale price, and the figures reconcile with the title and the Section 32. Where the figures are tight, the disclosure is incomplete, or there are unresolved title issues, the prudent course is to object and let the deposit remain in trust until settlement.
- Who holds the deposit before it is released?
- The deposit is held by a stakeholder under the contract — most often the selling agent's trust account, or in some sales the seller's conveyancer or lawyer. The stakeholder's job is to hold the funds; the buyer's protection comes from the right to object to early release, not from the stakeholder's judgment of the statement.
Related articles.
Section 32 vendor statement Victoria: what buyers and sellers need to know
A careful guide to Victoria's vendor statement — when it must be given, what sections 32A–32I require, what buyers should verify, and how section 32K rescission rights operate.
Cooling-off period in Victoria: how the 3 clear business days work
Buying property in Victoria? A plain-English guide to when the cooling-off period applies, how the three clear business days are counted, when it does not apply, and what it costs to cool off.
What is a property caveat?
A plain-English guide to property caveats in Victoria — what they are, who can lodge them, how they affect buying and selling, and what to do if a caveat appears on title.